From: Frank van Harmelen (Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl)
Date: 03/21/01
Mike Dean wrote:
>
> > I also uploaded a revised walkthrough document.
>
> [1] and [2] have been updated. Thanks!
>
> Mike
>
> [1] http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html
>
> [2] http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-walkthru.html
I received the following email,
which seems useful to fix.
Frank.
---
Subject: DAML case sensitivity
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:52:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Vera Zaychik <uvzaychi@mcs.drexel.edu>
To: Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl
Hello,
I apologize for emailing you directly instead of the whole list but I am
not on any of the DAML lists, plus this is just report of a glitch in the
example ontology.
In several places cardinality properties are spelled all lower-case (i.e.
maxcardinality), while they are actually defined as
maxCardinality/minCardinality. I thought that RDF is case sensitive and
thus expected DAML to be such as well. I assume this was just a small
glitch overlooked.
I have many other questions like this (ones of a naive user).
Sincerely,
Vera Zaychik
Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST